Incredible medical discovery finds link between ovary removal and breast cancer survival 16



View Profile

For those of us who have been affected by breast cancer either directly or indirectly, we know just how devastating it can be to go through. It can change your whole life in an instant. Looking back, or even right now, if you could increase your chances of survival, would you remove your ovaries?

Removal of the ovaries, a procedure known as an oophorectomy, was associated with a 62 per cent reduction in breast cancer death in women diagnosed with breast cancer and carrying a BRCA1 gene mutation, according to an article published online by JAMA Oncology.

For those women who carry either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, they face a lifetime risk of breast cancer – up to 70 per cent more than those without the variation in genomes. And once they are diagnosed with breast cancer, the fight is not over as they face high risks of both second primary breast and ovarian cancers.

A study of 676 women, of whom 345 underwent oophorectomy after being diagnosed with breast cancer, and 331 women retained both ovaries, found the 20-year survival for the entire group was 77.4 per cent. Overall, there was a 56 percent reduction in breast cancer death associated with oophorectomy. Undergoing an oophorectomy was associated with a 62 percent decrease in breast cancer death in women with a BRCA1 mutation, although not in women with a BRCA2 mutation – the 43 per cent reduction that the authors found was not statistically significant.

Sadly, in the case study, nine women died from ovarian cancer in the group of women who did not have their ovaries removed after being diagnosed with breast cancer. From this data, authors Steven A. Narod, M.D., and Kelly Metcalfe, Ph.D., of the Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada, and coauthors found a 65 per cent reduction in all-cause mortality associated with oophorectomy in their analysis.

The authors note the protective effect of oophorectomy on deaths from breast cancer was apparent immediately after diagnosis and lasted for 15 years.

“It is important that follow-up studies be performed on women who undergo oophorectomy as part of their initial treatment, in particular, those women who undergo oophorectomy in the first year after diagnosis. It is also important that our observations be confirmed in other study populations” article concludes.

Editor-in-chief of JAMA Oncology, Mary L. Disis, M.D., wrote in response: “The results provide a validation of the role of oophorectomy in conveying both a disease-free and overall survival benefit for BRCA1 mutation carriers. Oophorectomy after the primary diagnosis of breast cancer significantly reduced breast cancer-specific mortality in women with BRCA1 mutations but not in BRCA2 mutation carriers. In the entire group, oophorectomy was particularly effective for survival benefit in women with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer”.

Tell us below, have you heard of this method of protection for future cancers after breast cancer? Would you have done it if you had known? How has breast cancer affected your life or someone close to you? 

Starts at 60 Writers

The Starts at 60 writers team seek out interesting topics and write them especially for you.

  1. What took them so long? Oestrogen is produced from ovaries even dormant ones, so oestrogen positive breast cancers have fuel if left in. Not rocket science.

    1 REPLY
    • Anecdotal evidence – no matter how sensible it appears – is discounted, sneered at and pooh-poohed until someone has the enormous funds to make the anecdotal evidence suddenly become an “incredible medical discovery”

  2. All the Doctors, scientists, researchers, Phd’s, laboritory assistants, others who carry out this amazing studies are rewarded when they make life saving findings.Their service to the public should also be congratulated, Well done to All involved Thank You.

    1 REPLY
    • Totally agree,every day there is someone working away patiently in a Lab,and I for one truly appreciate them.

  3. Mum had a lump out of the breast in 1974 She kept particular notice of her breasts after that – but died of undetected ovarian cancer 27 years later.

  4. I a I I had a total hysterectomy(i.e. womb, ovaries, tubes removed) at the age of 36 and then at the age of 42 I had breast cancer and a left breast mastectomy. I turned 70 this February.

  5. Had my ovaries removed in 1976, aged 35, as part of a hysterectomy. Breast cancer in 1994, 2008. Had lumpectomy and radiotherapy. When I got it again in 2013, after 5 years of Tamoxifen, my surgeon recommended a bilateral mastectomy, best decision I ever made. I have been cured. Don’t know if there is any connections between losing my ovaries and my survival.. My younger sister lost her life because of breast cancer, still had her ovaries!

  6. I have just had lumpectomy and it has hormone receptors. I am waiting for them to decide which way to treat me because the dye failed for the lymph nodes. I have had hysterectomy but still have ovaries so I will be asking about the removed. I am 65 but would like to be around for another few years.

  7. My mother died of ovarian cancer.
    And her mother, & her mother’s sister, both had (post menopause) breast cancer…
    I have annual mammograms & have had my ovaries removed!

  8. Having the lot removed in just over a week…uterus, ovaries, tubes, cervix…this article is a good reinforcement to my decision.

  9. Breast and ovarian Cancer are closely linked.I had breast cancer and when my mother died of Ovarian Cancer a year later my sister and I had both our ovaries removed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *