
There is a particular kind of exhaustion that has nothing to do with how much sleep you got, and everything to do with having spent forty-five minutes on the phone with someone who found something wrong with absolutely everything. The weather. Their neighbour. The government. Their knee. You hang up the phone feeling like you’ve been standing in a headwind, and you can’t entirely explain why, because nothing actually happened to you. You just stood near someone else’s storm for a while.
We’ve all got one. A friend, a sibling, a colleague from the old job who still calls, a spouse’s relative you’re stuck seeing at every family occasion, for whom the glass isn’t just half empty, it’s chipped, the wrong shape, and someone else’s fault. I want to talk honestly about how to survive them, without either becoming their doormat or turning into someone you don’t much like yourself.
Before I go any further, I want to say something that I think doesn’t get said often enough, particularly to people our age: we get more cynical the longer we’re on this earth, and there’s no use pretending otherwise. Anecdotally, and I’d wager you’ve noticed this in yourself as much as in anyone else, decades of watching promises break, watching institutions disappoint you, watching your own body do things you didn’t sign up for, will do that to a person. It would be strange if it didn’t.
I say this not to excuse the Negative Nancys of the world, but to be fair to them, and to us, before I’m considerably less fair to them for the rest of this column. A certain amount of hard-won scepticism isn’t a character flaw. It’s often just information, collected over a long life, about how things tend to actually go. The difference between healthy scepticism and the exhausting, all-consuming negativity we’re talking about today is really a question of volume and direction. One person has learned to expect a bit of rain and packs an umbrella. The other has decided it is raining always, everywhere, on everyone, and would like you to stand out in it with them.
Here’s something worth understanding properly, because it isn’t just in your head. Empathy, as a resource, is genuinely finite. You only have so much of it to give out in any given day, any given week, and a person who consistently pulls from that well without ever topping it back up will, eventually, leave you running on empty. It isn’t weakness on your part that you feel depleted after time with them. It’s simply arithmetic.
What makes chronic negativity particularly hard to be around, as opposed to an ordinary bad day someone’s having, is that it tends to resist being fixed. Offer a solution to a genuinely negative person and watch how quickly it gets waved away, replaced with a fresh reason why that wouldn’t work either. That’s often not really about the problem at hand. It’s about a person who has, consciously or not, settled into negativity as a kind of home address, and isn’t necessarily looking to move.
I don’t believe in cutting people off lightly, particularly family, particularly at our age, when the list of people who’ve known us across an entire lifetime only gets shorter. So here is what I’d actually suggest, in order of how gently it starts.
Limit the dose, not the person. You don’t need to disappear from someone’s life entirely to protect your own peace. A fifteen-minute phone call has a natural end point that a two-hour lunch doesn’t. See them for coffee, not dinner. Call them on your way to somewhere else, so there’s a built-in exit.
Choose your moments. Don’t schedule time with your most draining relative on a day you’re already running on fumes yourself. You wouldn’t go for a swim in rough water when you’re exhausted. The same logic applies here.
Say the plain thing, once you’re ready. This is the hardest one, and I won’t pretend otherwise. But there’s real dignity in telling someone, calmly and without cruelty, that you love them and you’re not going anywhere, but that you need the relationship to hold room for more than their complaints. Something like: I care about you far too much to let this be the only thing between us. That sentence does more good, over time, than a decade of quietly screening their calls.
And forgive yourself for needing a break. You are not obligated to be endlessly available as somebody else’s emotional waiting room, no matter how long you’ve known them, no matter what you owe them from the past. Wanting some peace and quiet in your own life is not selfishness. It’s simply self-preservation, and at this stage of life, I think you’ve rather earned the right to it.
Somewhere underneath most Negative Nancys is a person who has, at some point, decided that expecting the worst is safer than hoping for something better and being let down again. I understand that impulse more than I’d like to admit some days. But you are allowed to decline the invitation to join them there, even while you love them, even while you stay in their life. You can hold someone’s hand without stepping into their storm.
Have a question for Bess? Write to her at [email protected] with “Dear Bess” in the subject line.
Comments 0
Join the conversation. Comments are reviewed before they appear.
Be the first to comment.
Join the conversation
Tell us who you are to post a comment. We'll remember you next time.