There is a pattern happening inside Australian aged care facilities that affects one in four residents, increases their risk of serious harm and has a name most families have never heard of.
It is called a prescribing cascade – and new research from some of Australia’s leading aged care researchers suggests it is far more common, and far more dangerous, than most people realise.
The concept is straightforward, even if the consequences are not. A prescribing cascade occurs when the side effect of a medication is mistaken for a new medical condition, and a second medication is prescribed to treat it. That second medication may itself produce side effects, which may then be treated with a third medication – and so on.
Over time, the number of medications a person is taking grows, each one adding complexity, increasing the risk of further side effects and making it progressively harder to identify which drug is causing which problem. It is a cycle that can quietly compound until a person is taking a significant number of medications, some of which may be doing more harm than good.
The study, led by the Registry of Senior Australians Research Centre at SAHMRI and Flinders University and published in the journal Age and Ageing, analysed the medication records of more than 167,000 Australians aged 65 and over who entered long-term residential care facilities.
The findings are striking. Before entering aged care, 16.7 per cent of residents had already experienced at least one prescribing cascade. After admission, that figure rose to 25.1 per cent – meaning one in four residents was caught in a cycle of medications being prescribed to treat the side effects of other medications.
Many of the prescribing cascades involved medications already recognised as high-risk in older populations, including antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and opioids – drugs that carry well-documented risks of falls, confusion, sedation and cognitive decline in elderly patients.
The transition into residential aged care is one of the most vulnerable periods for medication safety. Medication regimens often change significantly at this point, residents may be seen by new doctors who are not familiar with their full history, and declining health or increased frailty can trigger new prescriptions.
Lead researcher Professor Gill Caughey says treatment decisions can easily compound in this environment.
“What we’re seeing is that many residents are exposed to patterns of prescribing that may unintentionally lead to harm,” Professor Caughey said. “While some prescribing may be appropriate, we found many prescribing cascades that involved medications deemed inappropriate by international guidelines for the older population.”
The study found additional prescribing cascades among people living with dementia, many linked to sleep disturbance and sedation. For a person whose cognitive function is already compromised, the addition of sedating medications carries particular risks – including increased confusion, falls and accelerated cognitive decline.
“For people living with dementia, the risks can be even more complex,” Professor Caughey said.
The challenge is that many of the symptoms being treated with additional medications – sleep problems, agitation, restlessness – may themselves be side effects of existing prescriptions rather than new conditions requiring new drugs. Without careful review, the cascade continues.
For the millions of Australian families with a loved one in residential aged care, or approaching that transition, this research carries a practical message: ask about the medications.
Specifically, families can ask the following questions at any medication review or GP appointment:
Professor Caughey says the research points to a clear opportunity for intervention.
“There’s a real opportunity here to intervene earlier through routine medication reviews, better monitoring of side effects and, where appropriate, deprescribing strategies,” she said. “Improving awareness of prescribing cascades among clinicians and care teams can help ensure we’re treating the root cause of symptoms, rather than unintentionally adding to the burden of care.”
Australia’s aged care system has been under intense scrutiny since the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety delivered its findings in 2021. Medication management was identified as a significant concern, with the Commission recommending stronger safeguards around prescribing practices in residential care.
This latest research suggests that while awareness is growing, the problem persists – and that the transition into care remains a critical moment where medication safety can go wrong.
For older Australians and their families, the takeaway is not to be alarmed, but to be informed. Medications save lives and manage conditions that would otherwise cause significant suffering. But every medication carries risks, and the more medications a person takes, the more important it becomes that someone – a GP, a pharmacist, a geriatrician, a family member — is asking whether each one is still doing what it was prescribed to do.
One in four aged care residents is caught in a prescribing cascade. That is a number worth knowing.
Comments 7
Join the conversation. Comments are reviewed before they appear.
You can always ask for an evaluation of prescriptions & if there are any conflicts/interactions between them. There is a free service through the Pharmacy's.
You need to be cognitive to do this!!!
Polypharmacy
Often with the best of intentions
Is lethal for aged people
As a nurse
Have seen this over and over
Audits are conducted 1/4ly to review residents on 10 or more meds
But they still slip through the cracks
Especially with inexperienced health professionals- new admissions- undiagnosed conditions
I’ve seen many patients die
I worked at the Department of Veteran Affairs for 16 years until my retirement at the age of 70 in 2014. When I joined the Department in 1998 I very quickly became aware that doctors were being influenced by Big Pharma to an enormous degree for its own benefit, and not necessarily to the benefit of the aged care resident. Often the family didn't interfere and left the prescribing of medication up to the doctor, which meant that the patient was left with no one to be vigilant on their behalf that often lead to a poor outcome for their health. My 16 years of seeing this happen made me determined that all the while I still had my faculties I would stay away from aged care homes that to me seemed to have morphed into concentration camps for the elderly and the vulnerable. At the age of 82 I'm not and never have been leading a medicated life and follow a healthy diet of natural foods together with several vitamin, mineral and cutting edge supplements to keep me as healthy as possible. I've had several friends that were in aged care homes and the food, if that's what it can be called, is not conducive to maintaining an acceptable level of physical and mental health. It's almost as if it's been designed to accelerate their demise.
My family is currently going through this nightmare scenario. As advocate for my elderly relative I have asked for an independent review.
It's another money income for the aged care homes.When Mt mother was in one her monthly medication statements were ridiculous.Everyone that has a loved one in aged care homes must question the amount of medications prescribed to their loved ones.
You certainly should question whether long term medications are still effective.
My wife is now on “palliative watch “ and all educations have been ceased.
This has now lasted for about 8 weeks. Leads my to ask, “why was I paying for a heap of prescriptions?
Join the conversation
Tell us who you are to post a comment. We'll remember you next time.