Let’s talk: Could this legislation change make Aussies more racist?

With the newly elected government, there are bound to be new changes. But this is possibly a change that could

With the newly elected government, there are bound to be new changes. But this is possibly a change that could cause mayhem in the country and around its reputation around the world.

Liberal Democrat senator David Leyonhjelm plans to introduce a bill to remove section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which makes it unlawful for someone to do an act that is reasonably likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” someone because of their race or ethnicity. Crossbench senators Derryn Hinch, Bob Day and One Nation politicians have also voiced support for amending 18C, which was brought in by the Keating government in 1995.

The Racial Discrimination Act was first introduced in 1975 and changes to 18C were made in 1995 when Parliament passed the Racial Hatred Act.

Senator Leyonhjelm has long supported removing section 18C completely, and was quoted saying, “Free speech is free speech, there’s no qualification to it, let’s just remove 18C entirely and everything that goes with it. We’re going to have a choice between my approach, which is going further, and the more modest approach,” he said, referring to Family First Senator Bob Day’s plans to introduce more “modest” changes to the law. Senator Day’s changes suggest to “keep the words ‘humiliate’ and ‘intimidate’, but remove the highly subjective terms ‘offend’ and ‘insult’.”

“If you want to take offence that’s your choice, you have a choice of choosing another feeling,” Senator Leyonhjelm said. “Offence is always taken, not given. So if you don’t want to be offended, its up to you, don’t be offended, that’s it. We’re not responsible for the feelings of other people, none of us are.”

New One Nation senator-elect Malcolm Roberts also reiterated his similar stance on the race discrimination laws, saying, “It is very important to the country because at the moment a lot of people are afraid to speak up.” He said that the current laws were originally introduced to “nobble” conservative commentator Andrew Bolt, and added that “Julia Gillard did that.” Mr Roberts said he shared Senator Leyonhjelm’s view on not being responsible for other people’s feelings. “You can call me short, you can me fat, you can call me a Queenslander, you can call me a cane toad,” he said. “Whatever you want to call me, the only person who decides whether I’m upset is me.”

In 2011, Mr Bolt was successfully sued under the act for a series of articles he wrote on Aboriginals, including some that implied light-skinned people who identified as Aboriginal did so for personal gain.

On the other side of this saga is Senator Nick Xenophon, who has ruled out supporting any future changes to the Act. While he says he “can understand some of the arguments put forward,” he said the failed attempt for amendments by the former Abbott government “weren’t well considered.” He also said, “When you have both the Jewish community and Arab community on a unity ticket, in the same room, saying ‘we think these amendments are reckless’, then you know this is an area that we shouldn’t go down.”

Attorney-General George Brandis ruled out changes to the legislation last week. Shadow Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said attacks on the Act were driven by “ill-informed comment”, and voiced concerns that there would be a “rise in hate speech in the community” if the Act was weakened. He also said the issue would be a test of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s leadership.

Do you think we should be making changes to the Act?


  1. Get rid of 18C completely, it’s just rank stupidity.

    Offence can only be taken, never given. If I make a statement that offends someone yet others find my statement funny, who is correct? It’s a little like beauty really – it’s in the eye of the beholder.

    • [email protected]  

      I agree wholly with you Rob. Get rid of 18c completely.

  2. I get paid £96 every hour from online jobs. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my friend Pamela Peavey is earning £11k /monthly by doing this job and she showed me how…IA..

    Find out more HERE—-

  3. I get paid £96 every hour from online jobs. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my friend Pamela Peavey is earning £11k /monthly by doing this job and she showed me how…IA..

    Find out more HERE—- JobsGap1.Com

  4. Vicki Hooper  

    Yes get rid of the darn thing …A law that can be abused and never put to good use

    • [email protected]  

      Agree Vicki. Should never have been implemented in the first place. How come we never hear of all the changes that are made. The people should be asked, and the government not just doing what it wants.

  5. Cathy Howat  

    No, why allow people to speak hatred?

  6. Stephen  

    The basic justification for the removal of limitations to free speech that these Senators are stating is “We are not responsible for other peoples feelings”. How heartless and callous is that, have these so called human beings become so politicised that they have lost all responsibility of humanity. They stood for election on the premise of responsible leadership for our nation, not callous disregard for sensitive human beings. Removing 18C is not protecting peoples rights it is justifying their wrongs; shame on these Right Dishonourable Senators.

    • You have missed the point Stephen. It is not about the other person’s feelings but about your own. It is, for example, about you being being able to tell me what’s on your mind – right or wrong – without fear because YOU FEEL the need to. To enable YOU have a subsequent robust, frank, detailed and factual discussion on that or any other matter – and I don’t mean by attacking the other person verbally, as Sonya Kruger was subjected to. By that I mean to put forward adult level cogent arguments to support YOUR feelings on the subject without the other party being able to counter those by childish “I’m not talking to you anymore, you’ve offended me and hurt my feeling'”‘ comments, which 18C allows. Your thoughts on the subject have nothing to do with THEIR feeling but it has everything to do with allowing those sort of people to stop you from proving or just providing your side of an argument or discussion. We all know there will always be more than one side to any story but 18C ensures only one side of the story will be known because those who choose to invoke it shut the other sides down. Getting rid of 18C is the best and only way to resume or start intelligent conversations and discussions.

  7. Pamela  

    I am offended by moslems saying they want to remove my head!

    But if I say that, I am considered racist (what RACE is islam?) and offensive to moslems!

    However, the law only works one way – i.e. against ordinary white Aussies who speak the truth against evil and wrong-doing!

  8. Thought or subjectively-based laws have no place in Australia so I agree the law must go.
    I don’t have a problem with genuine laws to prevent violence or vilification, provided they are applied to all offenders equally which doesn’t seem to be the case. Caucasians seem to get the sharp end of the pineapple.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *