Your say: should the Census have been saved? 55



View Profile

If you’re into your stats and the value of them for planning purposes, you’ll be happy to hear the Australian Census has been saved.

Treasurer Joe Hockey has confirmed the 2016 Census will proceed as planned with the Australian Bureau of Statistics to receive a $250 million increase in next Tuesday’s Federal Budget.  The money will be used for a critical upgrade of the Bureau’s computer system which hasn’t been modernised in more than 30 years.

“This significant Government investment will provide the infrastructure required by the ABS to continue delivering timely and quality economic, environmental, demographic and social statistics for Australia,” Mr Hockey said.

“This is vital to retaining confidence in ABS data, and equipping the ABS to drive innovation in the digital age.”

Media reports surfaced in February that the Census which takes a snapshot of Australia every five years would be scrapped and replaced with a smaller survey.  Instead, the 2016 Census will be Australia’s first truly digital census with more than two-thirds of households to fill out their Census data online.

Professor of Human Geography at the University of Queensland, Martin Bell told the Sydney Morning Herald it would have been a “bloody disaster” if the Census had gone from a five yearly survey to ten yearly.

“It really is the only comprehensive source of information we have at the local level.  There is no substitute.  If we had lost it, we would have been at risk of making uninformed decisions about investments in infrastructure, in social services and urban planning.  The government is to be congratulated,” Mr Bell said.

Tell us what you think? Are you happy the Census has been spared the financial axe in next week’s Budget? And is $250 million a reasonable amount to spend or should the money have gone to something else instead?





Starts at 60 Writers

The Starts at 60 writers team seek out interesting topics and write them especially for you.

  1. Absolutely needed due to our population growth. Have also found it very useful for information before purchasing real estate. Essential!

  2. Why is so much money needed to have a census. What idiot puts these costs together.

    1 REPLY
    • The cost is not so large when you consider it is a very labor intensive in the first two stages after which the computers take over and also remember this is for the whole of Australia even isolated communities and isolated grazing stations NOT just the capital cities.

  3. Yes. Remember we just paid some lame arse Nordic chappie $4 million because Hunt fancied him to advise our country that climate change is a benign phenomenon ! Have a close look at where our failed Govt will spend our taxes. They know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.

  4. Why not we just have Pakistan 24 million for what and we could only afford 5 million for earthquake victims in napal why shouldn’t we update statistics on our own people ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *