Public servants’ pensions could be hurt by tax reform 112



View Profile

Retired public servants could be in for a shock as half a million may have their age pension stripped off them in the government’s planned shake-up of the super tax system.

Changes could be made within months to stop generous tax breaks on retirement savings, and those of us who have worked for the state or government will not go unscathed.

Lifetime-indexed pensions, also known as the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme is a fortnightly CPI indexed pension for the member’s or a surviving partner’s lifetime. The benefits were so good that the federal government closed it to new members from 1 July 2005.

The pensions are not included in the asset tests for the aged pension despite the furore earlier this year around the asset tests for retirees – ending in 300,000 people losing their part pension.

News Limited economics writer Robert Gottliebsen said it was just a matter of fairness. “No one is suggesting public servants should be picked out for persecution, merely that they be treated the same as all other citizens of Australia”. He believes no one, even if they served the country, should be exempt from tax reform. Do you agree?

Annette Barbetti, federal president of the Australian Council of Public Sector Retiree Organisations, disagrees. She told Fairfax that the public sector indexed pension was nothing like a privately purchased annuity.

“Unlike most private sector superannuation pensioners, retired public servants cannot neither access the notional assets underlying their pensions nor leave them to their children,” Ms Barbetti said.

“The defined benefit pensions of retired Commonwealth public servants are taxed, with a 10 per cent tax offset, not a rebate, and consequently any other income is taxed at their marginal tax rate.

“There is now a 10 per cent cap on the proportion of a defined benefit pension that can be excluded from the age pension income test”.

Mr Gottliebsen said that it’s simply not fair that retired public servants have lifetime-indexed pensions but also get the aged pension, “because a lifetime-indexed pension is an incredibly valuable asset”.

“If someone who is not a public servant wants to buy a $50,000 lifetime indexed pension it will cost between around $750,000 and $1 million depending on their age and the supplier they choose. That investment of between $750,000 and $1m would then be treated as an asset for the pension assets test – as it should be”.

He said that public servants were not the only people who needed to have their benefits in line with the rest of the country. “Public servants, politicians, academics and judges should not be specifically targeted but rather, if the community is to be hit, then they should not be excluded”.

A decision about tax reform and everything regarding pensions and superannuation is expected before Christmas.


Tell us, do you think retired public servants should be included in the asset test? Or should they be able to get both the PSSS and the age pension? 


Starts at 60 Writers

The Starts at 60 writers team seek out interesting topics and write them especially for you.

  1. Surely this will include the politicians who all retire with god knows how much in super and benefits after whatever term they serve. After all they’re public servants too, aren’t they?

  2. Agree that all Australians should retire to similar benefits and their own super arrangements. But how can one save for retirement with the constantly changing rules and regulations.

  3. As the recipient of a government pension following my 32 years of military service and a further 10 years of commonwealth public service I believe that the proposals discussed in this article have merit. That said, I don’t see too many people being affected because under the current rules I will never (and should never mind you) be eligible for the age pension. But like a lot of folks I wouldn’t mind access to the Health Care Care which is a whole other kettle of fish.

  4. NO special treatment for anyone, especially those who have been paid by taxpayers all of their working life.

    3 REPLY
    • Anne you are talking shit. Public sector workers have many more advantages not available to the private sector workers (yes I have been both) Most public servants take advantage of very generous salary sacrifice arrangements (especially nurses and police that you mention) so that they pay minimum tax on a generous portion of their wages. Some (not all) are also paid very generously compared to the equivalent position in the private sector. Private sector workers can claim almost nothing against their tax so pay applicable tax rate on every dollar that they earn. I am not sure why you would mention them working for nothing? Not sure where that comment was coming from. I reiterate, no special treatment for anyone.

  5. About time, I have also had an issue with the fact that PS compulsory superannuation is higher than the average worker….why? On the other hand I have no issue with those who have been essential to our society, such as police, armed forces, ambos etc. receiving a better deal than the norm.

    2 REPLY
    • The superannuation scheme in the PS has been used as a means of attracting quality people to government employment. Don’t forget that equivalent type jobs in the private sector attract approx 3 times the salary as a senior public servant. I know there is some dead wood in the PS but you get that in every sphere of employment.

    • Federal government agency bargaining agreements always included the superannuation as part of the whole salary package and salaries were discounted around that. Most private employees never contributed to their own superannuation just getting the Superannuation Guarantee paid by the employer. If like PS they had also paid 5% of their own they’d be better off now. Compare the salary packages of the top Public Service executives and their private industry counterparts, most are very much lower.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *