Breaking: Question time in parliament suspended by bizarre protest method

Question Time in the House of Representatives has been temporarily suspended after a co-ordinated protest against the government’s offshore detention
Politics
Question Time in the House of Representatives has been temporarily suspended due to protest.

Question Time in the House of Representatives has been temporarily suspended after a co-ordinated protest against the government’s offshore detention regime was held in the public gallery. The large group of protesters shouted pro-refugee slogans and criticised the government’s detention policies and went as far as superglueing their hands to the seats.

The daily Question Time began at 2pm. After an opening question from Labor to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, Liberal MP Melissa Price took the floor to begin a question to the PM about “the government’s achievements” in economic reform. At that point, shouts erupted from the public gallery overlooking the floor of the House of Representatives, reports Huffington Post.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Opposition leader Bill Shorten sat in the House of Representatives watching the protestors in the gallery above, as they shouted slogans at MPs.

“You are all complicit in the murder, rape, torture and child abuse of refugees,” the chants began, mentioning Manus Island, Nauru and Christmas Island.

“You shame us on the international stage. You have failed every single person seeking asylum. Your policies are killing innocent people. Your policies are separating families. You use our money to abuse refugees.”

“The madness needs to stop.”

Security officers struggled to contain or remove them, with the protesters claiming they had superglued their hands to the rails, reports SBS.

“We are here today because your policies are breaking our hearts because every day on Manus and Christmas Island is another day in hell,” one of them said.

Those in the chamber estimated the group to be at around 30 people. Parliament House security arrived to deal with the protest, but unable to shift the large group, the Australian Federal Police soon turned up.

Speaker of the House, Tony Smith, waited around three minutes as the chants continued unabated. Turnbull and Labor leader Bill Shorten waited, unamused, as the protest continued. Eventually, Smith called for Question Time to be halted until the group could be removed.

A group called the Whistleblowers, Activists and Citizens Alliance (WACA) took to Twitter to claim responsibility for the protest.

The story has erupted on the internet and people are divided on the Question Time incident.

While some called the protest and act of bravery, some said that it did not achieve anything positive.

Source: Twitter.
The protest has sparked an intense debate on Twitter. Source: Twitter.

Are you shocked at the protest methods? Do you think it was fair for the Question Time to be halted that way?

  1. Citizen  

    Since they are safe inside away from the elements. I would turn off the lights and the last words I would say are “see you tomorrow!”

  2. Patrick  

    I agree with ‘citizen’ leave them as they are for at least 24 hours , the see what hero’s they are, at least you know where they are & what they are up to & they’re not hindering hard working Australians.

  3. Greg Hills  

    Leave them there for a few days to ponder their plight. They might be sorry for their action after they have soiled themselves a few times and are perilously close to dehydration.
    Not a very affective method of getting their argument across at all. After all of this, no one will even remember why they were there in the first place.
    The public will just be laughing at them, as distinct from with them.

  4. Gavin Weston  

    Protesting in a democratic society is an accepted way of expressing ones views as different from society at large and the Governing bodies. Generally it is useless as it achieves little except bringing the matter to the publics attention via the medias. However what is the use of protesting if you achieve nothing? The purpose of disagreeing with what is the matter under protest is to bring about change in a manner that is agreeable to the protesters. That involves a constructive positive agenda put forward to achieve the changes wanted. Yelling and screaming anywhere generally has a negative affect on the protest. Generally the protesters are young people who have not as yet had enough of life to get a balanced objective view of the matter that is under protest, not always I admit but generally. It requires the use of brains and careful considerations to the argument the protesters are putting forward. When this is done it is surprising just how this approach can bring about changes in our society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *