Retirees forced to chase risk: Do you have a choice? 6



View Profile

The Reserve Bank Governor stood up yesterday and flagged his concern that retirees could be forced to take riskier investments than they or many bureaucrats in our country would like in order to have an income in coming years. We’re now in a world where risk-free assets have little or no return, and certainly barely beat inflation rates; and he indicated he feels the economy is likely to stay that way for a long time.

So retirees are forced to buy an income stream with their money, finding ways to generate the income they have to provide for themselves increasingly in our ever-restricted budgetary environments.

And he signalled how tough it is likely to be for those of you setting up for retirement right now.

“Those seeking to make that purchase now – that is, those on the brink of leaving the workforce – are in a much worse position than those who made it a decade ago,” said Mr Stevens in his speech.

“They have to accept a lot more risk to generate the expected flow of future income they want”.

Mr Stevens fired shots at the major banks for their lack of integrity in financial planning, and discussed the commissions and incentives the financial planners receive to sell one product over another. Three of Australia’s largest banks have been caught up in financial planning scandals in recent years, and he is not happy about the continued challenges in this space as retirees suffer greater and greater stress to their income.

“Finance depends on trust. In fact, in the end, it can depend on little else. Where trust has been damaged, repair has to be made,” he told the audience at the Banking & Wealth Summit.

The Reserve Bank Governor’s speech is worth a read, if you are a follower of financial and banking markets. He is clearly knifing the banks and their control of the superannuation market.

And the final issue is misconduct. This has loomed larger for longer in many jurisdictions than we would have thought likely a few years ago. Investigations and prosecutions for alleged past misconduct are ongoing. It seems our own country has not been entirely immune from some of this. Without in any way wanting to pass judgement on any particular case, root causes seem to include distorted incentives coupled with an erosion of a culture that placed great store on acting in a trustworthy way.

Finance depends on trust. In fact, in the end, it can depend on little else. Where trust has been damaged, repair has to be made. Both industry and the official community are working hard to try to clarify expected standards of behaviour. Various codes of practice are being developed, calculation methodologies are being refined, and so on. In some cases regulation is being contemplated. Initiatives like the Banking and Finance Oath also can make a very worthwhile contribution, if enough people are prepared to sign up and exhibit the promised behaviour.

In the end, though, you can’t legislate for culture or character. Culture has to be nurtured, which is not a costless exercise. Character has to be developed and exemplified in behaviour. For all of us in the financial services and official sectors, this is a never-ending task”.

Are you taking Glenn Stephens, and other economists warnings seriously enough to be reconsidering your investments for a long term low interest rate environment where the only way to make money is through risk? 

Have you managed to find comfortable ways to approach these challenges? 

Rebecca Wilson

Rebecca Wilson is the founder and publisher of Starts at Sixty. The daughter of two baby boomers, she has built the online community for over 60s by listening carefully to the issues and seeking out answers, insights and information for over 60s throughout Australia. Rebecca is an experienced marketer, a trained journalist and has a degree in politics. A mother of 3, she passionately facilitates and leads our over 60s community, bringing the community opinions, needs and interests to the fore and making Starts at Sixty a fun place to be.

  1. We put our little bit of money we had left into a term deposit.No risk an dis there if we need it.We are not well off but own our house and have no credit cards or other nasty bills.We live on our pension.

  2. I can’t understand why everyone doesn’t put their money in a super pension fund run by an industry fund such as Hesta or Care Super, or Telstra Super. They give good guidance about how to sort the investments in their fund for free (they don’t say they are financial advisors) and the returns have been exceptional these last two years. Of course the stockmarket is a gamble, but relatively risk minimal because you can change the investment type. And you can always convert the investments to cash investments for a more stable return if you are worried.

    1 REPLY
    • The problem being is that a low interest rate affects ALL investments and that includes Hesta, Rest…everyone, so there is no evading the consequences of low interest rates….

  3. Super?? It is a BIG FRAUD!!! Run by the banks or big financial bizzos like MLC…they charge enormous fees and most people WILL lose$$. PLUS, the pololies will get their grubby hands on it eventually to pay for tHEIR huge life-time pensions…aftre 6 years of work…and for what work do thyey do? NONE!!!Term deposits are only keeping up with inflation and even they attract fees – Australian Super just increased their fees on these by some 600%!!! So, maybe investment property but that can also be problematic!

  4. Thoughtful article! from an investment perspective, with term deposits under 3%. Investors can still look for attractive dividend yields in blue chip ASX companies, with healthy balance sheet and >4% yield. I think it is possible to invest with low risk even in a low interest rate environment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *