We all love to help our kids out with their parenting, but how far is too far?
The issue has again hit social media, after a post on a website for mothers caused a debate.
So, what’s causing all the debate?
Well, a woman using the screen name Blondeandinept posted on the site Mumsnet asking for advice about her children’s lunch servings.
The meal of crumbed chicken, mozzarella sticks, salad and vegetables was for her six-year-old son and three-a-half-year-old daughter.
But apparently her mother-in-law was “appalled” by the size of the servings.
“My mil [mother-in-law] saw this and was appalled. Said it was way way too much. My children would be peckish an hour later if they didn’t have this kind of lunch (it’s the weekend, hence all the breaded items!)” the woman wrote.
“‘My son is on the 75 centile for height, 20 for weight,’ she explained. ‘My daughter is 50 for height, 25 for weight.
“As a family we are very very slim (in 5’7 and weigh just under 8 stone). We’re very fit, gym, sport etc.'”
The posted attracted more than 360 comments from mothers across the world, drawing a variety of opinions on whether the lunch serving was adequate or not.
“I think you should relax – if they are eating this amount and are a normal weight, it’s fine. And it’s none of her business,” one mother wrote.
“Looks fine to me, plenty of veg on the plate. Kids are great at telling you if they are too full/don’t want it. Ignore, they’re your kids!” another wrote.
But not everyone was as supportive.
“Actually looks too little, your cheesey things, 2 chips, 1 babycorn and few carrots/sprigs of brocolli tho fab variety of veg,” another woman wrote.
“The 5yr i looked after as a nanny would have demolished this in seconds.”
It’s debates like this that can quite often lead to arguments between parents/parents-in-law and their children.